##navigation.skip##

Dari Nilai Budaya ke Tata Kelola: Institusi Informal dan Ketahanan Energi di Melayu Riau

Authors

  • Daniel Saputra Sekolah Staf dan Komando Angkatan Udara Republik Indonesia Author
  • Andi Ersanto Sekolah Staf dan Komando Angkatan Udara Republik Indonesia Author
  • Jakop Dwi Waluyo Sekolah Staf dan Komando Angkatan Udara Republik Indonesia Author
  • Yanto S Manurung Sekolah Staf dan Komando Angkatan Udara Republik Indonesia Author
  • Komarudin Sekolah Staf dan Komando Angkatan Udara Republik Indonesia Author
  • Handoko Ivan Haryanto Sekolah Staf dan Komando Angkatan Udara Republik Indonesia Author
  • Kuswiyono Sekolah Staf dan Komando Angkatan Udara Republik Indonesia Author
  • Rio Artha Sekolah Staf dan Komando Angkatan Udara Republik Indonesia Author
  • Hengky Emanuel Sekolah Staf dan Komando Angkatan Udara Republik Indonesia Author
  • Ridho Amboro Sekolah Staf dan Komando Angkatan Udara Republik Indonesia Author
  • Yusa Djuyandi Departemen Ilmu Politik, Universitas Padjadjaran Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53611/0kwkry64

Abstract

Energy security is generally understood through the framework of energy availability, accessibility, affordability, and acceptability known as the “four A’s” framework. This framework does not fully explain how social values shape resource management practices or what values are actually being protected. Addressing this gap, the present study analyzes how the value of struggle rooted in Riau Malay culture contributes to energy resilience through the mechanisms of norm transmission, informal institutionalization, and governance practices. It employs a qualitative case study approach using data from interviews, observations, and documentation obtained from the Riau Malay Customary Institution, the Siak Sri Indrapura Palace, and the Sang Nila Utama Museum. Thematic analysis reveals that the values of trustworthiness, mutual aid, deliberation, integrity, responsibility, environmental stewardship, and self-sacrifice do not remain merely individual values but are transmitted and institutionalized as informal norms that shape collective behavior. These findings indicate that energy resilience has a normative dimension that must be considered alongside material capacity and formal institutions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ainou, F. Z., Ali, M., & Sadiq, M. (2023). Green energy security assessment in Morocco: Green finance as a step toward sustainable energy transition. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(22), 61411–61429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19153-7

Amin, S. B., Chang, Y., Khan, F., & Taghizadeh-Hesary, F. (2022). Energy security and sustainable energy policy in Bangladesh: From the lens of 4As framework. Energy Policy, 161, 112719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112719

Buzan, B., Waever, O., & Wilde, J. de. (2022). Security: A new framework for analysis. Boulder London: Lynne Rienner Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781685853808

Cherp, A., & Jewell, J. (2014). The concept of energy security: Beyond the four A’s. Energy Policy, 75, 415–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.09.005

Engwicht, N., & Grabek, J. (2019). A human security perspective on natural resource governance: What makes reforms effective? South African Journal of International Affairs, 26(2), 185–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/10220461.2019.1607545

Fouladvand, J. (2022). Behavioural attributes towards collective energy security in thermal energy communities: Environmental-friendly behaviour matters. Energy, 261, 125353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.125353

Goldthau, A., & Sovacool, B. K. (2012). The uniqueness of the energy security, justice, and governance problem. Energy Policy, 41, 232–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.10.042

Jibat, E., Senbeta, F., Zeleke, T., & Hagos, F. (2023). The role and interplay of institutions in water governance in the Central Rift Valley of Ethiopia. F1000Research, 12, 1434. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.138939.1

Kementerian Energi dan Sumber Daya Mineral Republik Indonesia. (2022a). Cegah Kerugian Negara Semakin Besar, Pembentukan Unit Penegakan Hukum Di KESDM Adalah Keniscayaan (Siaran Pers Nomor No. 316.Pers/04/SJI/2022). Kementerian ESDM. Diambil dari Kementerian ESDM website: https://www.esdm.go.id/id/media-center/arsip-berita/cegah-kerugian-negara-semakin-besar-pembentukan-unit-penegakan-hukum-di-kesdm-adalah-keniscayaan

Kementerian Energi dan Sumber Daya Mineral Republik Indonesia. (2022b). Pertambangan Tanpa Izin Perlu Menjadi Perhatian Bersama (Siaran Pers Nomor No. 259.Pers/04/SJI/2022). Kementerian ESDM. Diambil dari Kementerian ESDM website: https://www.esdm.go.id/id/media-center/arsip-berita/pertambangan-tanpa-izin-perlu-menjadi-perhatian-bersama

Kementerian Energi dan Sumber Daya Mineral Republik Indonesia. (2025). Handbook of Energy & Economy Statistics of Indonesia. Jakarta: Kementerian ESDM.

Liebenguth, J. (2020). Conceptions of Security in Global Environmental Discourses: Exploring the Water-Energy-Food Security Nexus. Critical Studies on Security, 8(3), 189–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/21624887.2020.1754713

Panić, B. (2009). Societal Security – Security And Identity. Western Balkans Security Observer - English Edition, (13), 28–39.

Paravantis, J. A., & Kontoulis, N. (2020). Energy Security and Renewable Energy: A Geopolitical Perspective. Dalam M. Al Qubeissi, A. El-kharouf, & H. Serhad Soyhan (Ed.), Renewable Energy—Resources, Challenges and Applications. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.91848

Po, J. Y. T., Saint Ville, A. S., Rahman, H. M. T., & Hickey, G. M. (2019). On Institutional Diversity and Interplay in Natural Resource Governance. Society & Natural Resources, 32(12), 1333–1343. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2019.1667463

Rhinard, M. (2020). Societal security in theory and practice. Dalam S. Larsson & M. Rhinard, Nordic Societal Security (1 ed., hlm. 22–42). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003045533-3

Schmitz, R., Flachsbarth, F., Plaga, L. S., Braun, M., & Härtel, P. (2025). Energy security and resilience: Revisiting concepts and advancing planning perspectives for transforming integrated energy systems. Energy Policy, 207, 114796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114796

Schnegg, M. (2018). Institutional multiplexity: Social networks and community-based natural resource management. Sustainability Science, 13(4), 1017–1030. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0549-2

Siksnelyte-Butkiene, I. (2023). Defining the Perception of Energy Security: An Overview. Economies, 11(7), 174. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies11070174

Timmermann, C., & Noboa, E. (2022). Energy Sovereignty: A Values-Based Conceptual Analysis. Science and Engineering Ethics, 28(6), 54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-022-00409-x

Yami, M., Vogl, C., & Hauser, M. (2009). Comparing the Effectiveness of Informal and Formal Institutions in Sustainable Common Pool Resources Management in Sub-Saharan Africa. Conservation and Society, 7(3), 153. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-4923.64731

Ye, R., Yang, X., Zhou, Y., Lin, C., Chen, Y., Chen, J., & Bian, M. (2025). Energy demand security in OPEC+ countries: A revised 4As framework beyond supply security. Energy, 320, 135261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2025.135261

Yeboah-Assiamah, E., Muller, K., & Domfeh, K. A. (2019). Two Sides of the Same Coin: Formal and Informal Institutional Synergy in a Case Study of Wildlife Governance in Ghana. Society & Natural Resources, 32(12), 1364–1382. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2019.1647320

Downloads

Published

2026-10-05

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Dari Nilai Budaya ke Tata Kelola: Institusi Informal dan Ketahanan Energi di Melayu Riau. (2026). Jurnal Silatene Sosial Humaniora, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.53611/0kwkry64